Every April, thousands of poets around the world attempt a ridiculous challenge: Write 30 poems in 30 days. When I tell any not-poet (and, let’s be honest, many poets too) about this exercise, they usually look at me with a mix of concern and confusion: Isn’t poetry supposed to be meditative, drawn from deep wells of feeling, rather than a mechanical exercise? Also, is it really possible to churn out poem after poem, day after day, for a whole month— and if so, then why on earth do you take 5 years to write a book of poems?!
All fair questions.
But what if I told you I’m not trying to get 30 poems from the 30/30 challenge? That I am aware the majority of them will be mediocre, some open to revisions into actual poems, some intended only to toss away? I do believe you can’t get to the good poems without getting the bad ones out of the way, though, so part of how I look at it is this: If I get the first drafts of 5 or 10 actual poems from the 30/30 challenge, that’s first drafts of 5 or 10 more poems than I would otherwise have written this month, moving between teaching, a consultant gig, my non fiction book, and a million personal commitments.
But that’s the boring part of it.
The real reason I do 30/30 once every 2 or 3 years is because of how it shifts the way I look at the world. In order to write anything like a poem everyday, you pretty quickly start looking to the world around you for ideas and inspiration. You pick up a fork at dinner and ask are you a poem?. You walk under an Amaltas tree and look at its yellow flowers and ask are you a poem?. You pick up your cat at the neighbourhood park and ask her are you a poem?. Sometimes the answer is yes, sometimes the answer is leave me alone, I’m just a cat, but the regular asking shifts something profound about how I interact with the world.
Take this picture, for instance. Last week, I was on a group hike in the mountains, and someone built us this gorgeous fire to warm us up as we stepped out of our tents one morning. I brought my cup of tea to the fire, sat around it talking with other folks, but a part of my brain was obsessed with the shapes of these logs. I don’t know what you see here, but I distinctly saw a crocodile with its scaly skin, leaning into the fire, and a seal coming up to gently kiss its cheek.
Are you a poem?
Hell, yes.
As the fire blazed on, it eventually whittled the crocodile into a dragon, then into the skull of a T-Rex at a museum, and I stood there fascinated. I would probably have noticed some interesting animal-like shapes even if I weren’t doing 30/30, but the close attention I pay to the world when I’m doing it changes how I take everything in. It gives me permission — reason, even— to pause, to observe, to return to an image over and over, to make meaning of it. The odd-shaped log turns into a poem about how my high school art teacher taught us to squint in order to fully see the world. The log is never just a log again.
I do the same for my body. In order to create a clear image of my grief or my joy, I pay careful attention. It is easy to locate these in tired images of the heart, but I find, for example, that sadness always sits on my diaphragm, like a copper ball pushing it down. In order to write honestly, I have to pay honest attention— and if I do that faithfully every day for 30 days, it reshapes the quality of my interactions with my internal and external worlds.
I do not write to publish (although publishing is a happy way to share and begin new conversations). I write for what it does to how I inhabit the world. 30/30, done right, helps me notice, and there’s nothing I prize more.
I love this. I feel like it's a perspective that is often left out of conversations about **why practice** -- not just for the honing of craft, not just to help get ourselves past the terror of the blank page, but because of the way it gives us reason to reconsider our own experiences through a more creative lens. Beautifully put.